hisluvmonkey said "We got the alert, too, as well as seeing it on the news. The odds were slim that this child was in Manitoba, but if I knew she was in my area, I would have walked up and down every street in town to find her. What if it had been your child or a child you loved?????? People complaining about these alerts are truly heartless. I prayed she would be found safe, sadly this morning I learned that it ended in tragedy. This mother lost a child, the world lost a dear little soul, and you are bitching about a bit of lost sleep? Give your head a shake. "
Sorry to use this post as an example hisluvmonkey but I feel the point of a few posters on here has been missed. You said you got the alert last night as well. You said you realized the chances were slim that the child could be in Manitoba but if you knew she was in the area you would walk up and down every street. So did you? Did you get bundled up and walk up and down every street? Or did you do like every other single person did in Brandon who received the alert: say "Oh my. that's awful" and go back to what you were doing. Not judging, but the fact is you realized that the alert was not for anything even remotely close to where you live and your search would have been in vain.
The point that pinkflamingos and others are trying to make is the Amber alert system is an exceptionally good thing and we have the technology available to make it work very effectively but the more it is used incorrectly the less effective it is going forward.
Let me give another example.....(continued)