Collective vs. individual rights
3/29/2016 at 1:54 PM
| | | Some_Guy said "The first 2 responses on this thread are a huge part of the problem as well. Some vaccines can only be given after a certain age, and some people have other health conditions that prevent them from receiving vaccines. If a child of an "anti-Vaxxer" gets a disease because they chose not to vaccinate, they can then spread that disease to people who are unable to vaccinate. It isn't as simple as "vaccinate your kid and don't worry about anyone else". But unfortunately yes, it is to each their own. " |
|
|
Ultimately, it was concern for people who couldn't receive vaccinations that made me change camps. My oldest has a chronic medical condition that causes her to have serious reactions to vaccines, and and is contraindicated from receiving more. I didn't vaccinate my other children for years because I was concerned it would happen again. For a long time, I had the youngest children in the family so I wasn't concerned about passing pathogens along to cousins, etc.
However, in time I realized because they don't share the same medical condition with their sister that the risks were much, much smaller if they were vaccinated. I wanted to protect my daughter who cannot be vaccinated, as well as younger cousins who have since been born, including a couple of preemies. We've been playing catch-up on vaccinations ever since.
But there needs to be a balance between collective and individual rights. There is the collective right to herd immunity. But there is also the individual right to decline medical treatment if you deem it risky. Vaccines are not riskless, as I found out the hard way as a new parent. But ultimately it was fear that kept me from NOT vaccinating my other children. Now, it's concern not only for their long-term health (after years of reading about the science and the lessons of history) but for members of our community that drives me to comply with the recommendations.
But we need to have the freedom to choose.