There's someone to blame...
5/19/2017 at 1:43 PM
| | | ka712 said "I'm not blaming anyone. When I was asked to not park there I simply left. I just always thought up against the restaurant was for Marinos as that's how it used to be. " |
|
|
The blame sits squarely on the city and the developers. The planning board sets the guidelines with parking (like one stall for every four seats at a restaurant or one and a half stalls for a one bedroom apartment), but it's the bloody applications and careless approvals of zoning variances that screws everyone around. Apartments, businesses or homes... It doesn't seem to matter. Unless there's an very vocal and/or determined o:bjection brought forth before and during the the city council meeting, it usually gets read and rammed through. ...Mainly because the city wants/needs that tax revenue from the new build.
I hate the set-up for parking for a lot of places. Either they're too few or they're short and narrow compared to the older lot spaces. Just compare the mall or the old Fields/Sobey's at 34th to the Walmart or the any of the Tim Hortons spaces. ...Bit of a tighter fit with these newer lots don't you think? There are lots that I dare not attempt to go in to park with the minivan, let alone with the crew-cab half ton truck. Both vehicles are bigger then the full size cars from the seventies (not by much, Dads Olds 88 was 18 feet and Moms wagon measured 19.5 from stem to stern), but somehow in the last forty years the stalls are getting fewer and smaller. And that's because we've been letting them get away with it by slowly changing the by-laws over the years and now-n-days... just change or ignor it all together when it needs to suit the developers.
We see this problem come up almost every other month here on eBrandon in many different ways. "The new apartments has filled my street" or "These big trucks are taking two spots" or "Snow clearing can't get properly done" or "I got boxed in and waited over and hour to get out" and "Thank's for the door-ding 'ya dummy". All of these are usually rooted to variances approved for developers who are trying to squeeze in as much as they can by giving up designated parking space. The city needs to be more accountable for how property gets developed. That i:ncludes the functionality of the parking required for the business/property.
As for the Marinos and Robin's deal? ...Neither one should have been approved without revisions or additional property assigned for parking, especially Robin's with that tight drive through set-up. And the Clay pot just needs a speed bump or two to fix that problem.
Just my opinion, I could be wrong.