JustASoul said "This point is simply touching on the idea of using paper bags and is not related to any of the other issues, concerns or suggestions. The main reason people give for the use of paper bags is that they can degrade more rapidly than the alternatives. This is absolutely true.
However, it has not been so long since the environmentalists called for a ban on paper bags because we needed to save the trees. Society introduced more plastic as a response to public outcry. The result was a negative one. Now we have a public outcry against plastic. Why would we replace it with something that previously caused a public outcry? Are we not capable of learning from the past? "
If anything, that just showcases how short-sighted societies are. Paper bags made from virgin fibres IS a problem due to old growth forests also not being nearly regenerative enough to cover our paper needs.
Plastics were a seemingly good alternative, but not without drawbacks as well.
This can work. For example, Hemp paper bags.
I would have loved for a certain store in this city to have gone THAT route instead of bulk purchasing the obviously cheaper grey plastic bags (which are in plentiful supply thanks to Canada's biggest box store) and decorating them with greenwashing nonsense.
We will recycle this for you!
You mean, like the Canadian (and others from other national origins) grocery bags found dumped in Malaysia? Which were "recycled" to the highest bidder, which turned out to be an illegal trader?
Have some imagination, people.
Or alternatively, get used to it

. Much like the debate about the auto bins back in the day, we seem to have moved on from that. As such, I give it 2 or 3 years.